Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

There are a multitude of testing methods throughout the firmware development process. At the lowest level of tests are the unit tests, which cover almost all the firmware not directly related to the actuator control. These tests ensure firmware robustness and full error case coverage, thus ensuring higher reliability. One level above this is the Simulink simulation, which allows us to test the ability flight capabilities of our firmware to fly the and drone combinations in different weather conditions and circumstances at minimal cost and reduced operator hours. Another level above are the dry run integration tests, where firmware is loaded onto the UAV and each actuator response is verified. All in all, the firmware tests play a critical role in maintaining system stability and catching any errors which may have been in the code before flight tests.

Flight Tests

As the final level of testing, flight tests are performed once all subsystems are functional. These typically focus on the newly added and/or modified systems, as well as the overall process in successfully executing the mission. Flight tests also provide an opportunity for team members to become familiar with their roles at competitions, and identify issues therein.

...

The Safety firmware runs on an STM32F0 microcontroller and it generates actuator commands for onboard servos and electronic speed controllers (ESC) using commands from our autopilot or ppm PPM input form from a hobby receiver. It contains five main modules: the ppm PPM receiver module, which receives and packages ppm input from our hobby receiver; the inter-chip module, which receives and packages commands from our autopilot firmware; the Attitude Manager, which converts ppm and autopilot commands into actuator commands using PIDs and inverse kinematic (IK) working in tandem with motion control modules; an IMU sensor driver, which provides data for our IK controls models to run; and a PWM module that sends actuator commands to our servos and ESCs. The safety firmware is purposefully designed to contain only the modules needed to allow for manual flight, helping the safety code base be as simple and reliable as possible. The figure below illustrates the architecture of the safety firmware.

...

The Attitude Manager is designed to maintain attitude and stability of the quadcopter, residing on a separate chip and taking commands from operator inputs or from PM Waypoints. This module functions as an asynchronous (PLEASE CONFIRM) State machine with 7 (PLEASE CONFIRM) distinct states.

// insert diagram here.

...

Motion Controls Module

This controls module resides within Attitude Manager, and is responsible for keeping the drone in the air in all states of motion. At it’s simplest, the kinematic controls module ensures that our quadcopter always moves from our current position to a target position within a specified distance. It does this by using a variety of PID controllers on a quadcopter modelled in the la place domain.

...

  • Takeoff: After the takeoff area has been sweeped swept and cleared by CV, the autopilot firmware goes into takeoff mode. The Path Manager which is set to command a certain takeoff roll airspeed and execute a climb path to a predetermined cruising altitude. When the cruising altitude is reached, the Autopilot sets Path Manager into cruising flight mode which makes the drone follow a predefined flight path.

  • Landings: After the predefined landing coordinates are reached, the drone hovers in position, giving enough time for the CV system to clear the landing area. When the landing area is cleared, a landing command is sent to Path Manager and the state machine switches into Landing Mode which lowers the drone’s altitude at a fixed gps coordinate until contact with the ground is reached.

...