Megan Spee

Anything in this box please critique/discuss, comp selection processes should be scrutinized pretty hard so we can make it better

• How many people, from which subteams, etc.

• Looking at 14-16ish people? or 10-12?

  • this has definitely been discussed before. make a decision if possible

• the ‘process for selecting competition-goers’ documentation should be made easily available start of fall term, with expectations outlined pretty clearly.

• Options (what I can think of right now) - self nomination form, ‘up to lead discretion’ / ‘see who ends up coming to flight tests and being the most useful'

  • self nom form lets people declare that they will be interested/ plan to commit to the entire 8mo involvement, but might not reflect reality.

  • leads discretion means each lead needs to be watching for the next 8 months for people who show a lot of initiative, asking people in advance if they’d be interested, and making sure the expectations are known. Requires more oversight and attention to equal opportunity.

Leave final decision until at least march, can decide key people (pilots, gs operators) beforehand (dec/jan/feb??) to properly train up

Megan Spee , Georgia Vachon Westerlund

Generally:

• making sure we are advertising that we are always open to new members (depending on how many ppl we want to onboard)

• allowing members to quickly and easily understand what teams are working on and what they can expect to do on all of those teams

• on my mind:

  • posterboards explaining our drones (looks cool, easy to understand)

  • WARG branding (banners/stickers/idk)

  • Website to include more info?

The rest of it

• idk we’ll discuss this in the meeting