...
there is no clearance for the 28 inch props. With the current set up, the props would have to be hanging off the edge of a table.
tolerance issues between the busing and the two cylinders. It would be simpler to attach the prop directly to the load cell. This will probably yield to more accurate readings because there won’t by any issue related to friction and assembly.
Author: Alison Thompson Date: 2024/02/02
Drawing Review 1:
(Some of these comments are Conall’s too, he reviewed at the same time as me)
...
Your datum is inconsistent in the boxed-in view, it should be the same point in every view, especially be the same point for both horizontal and vertical in the same view - think when you use the mill you want your 0,0 to be one point on the part, so it should be the same point on the drawing
The crossed out view doesn’t give any useful information, it can be taken out
the boxed-in view should be the main view, it’s the most interesting and largest
Personally, I don’t like hidden lines but that’s up to you
You should make sure you hide your sketch, you can see a sketched line on the isometric view and the boxed-in view
Missing dimensions on the chamfers, if they’re all the same you can dimension one and add “TYP” indicating it’s the typical dimension for a chamfer on this part
Good work, lemme know if you want any of this explained in more detail :)