...
Constraints | Written By | Append Date |
|---|---|---|
Made out of aluminum (0.064in for bent aluminum) |
| |
Machinable |
| |
Integration with Height Adjustment Mechanism |
| |
Utlizes Utilizes Countersunk Holes for Tripod Interference (Ensure Screw Head and Baseplate thickness is adequate) OR Utilizes tapped holes in baseplate (Ensure screw length is adequate) |
Relevant Contacts
Subteam
Contact
Mechanical
Collaboration with height adjustment mechanism integration.
Assignees
Assignee | Asana Task | Date |
|---|---|---|
|
...
Or maybe they can look like this, though I don’t know if this can be (easily) machined.
...
Author: Arjun Mandair Date
Review 2:
Hey Justin Liu , Thanks for the help! Looks a lot better and appreciate the time it took to make these changes! Took a look at the assembly and still seems to be some confusion however. No worries! I have listed some comments below:
You have the right idea, however, imagine your implementation but flipped. Essentially, the counterbore cutout should be in the aluminum baseplate, where the screw’s end will be facing up. With the current implementation you have, there is no reason to even have counterbore holes in the first place. We need the counterbore holes to maneuver around the tripod interference. I have included a drawing below for reference.
...
Your method works, provided that there is a screw small enough in length where we can tap into the baseplate and not have tripod interference & there are no counterbore holes. No need for counterbores here if we go with this method. I have provided a drawing below.
...
Please feel free ask questions! Great work so far, and I appreciate the help!
Also great drawings and pictures! Pictures and drawings are worth a thousand words in Mechanical Engineering, so great work!