Comp Focusing all projects What we don’t want to be Members need to understand the system before they should be given the go ahead for very technical stuff. It’s brutal all our system engineering is wrapped up in a few people. It’s hard to design a board without understanding the application (and even harder if it’s your first board ever) will be discussed next leads meeting, very contentious Daniel Puratich R D leads should provide resources and direction we need to have leads who get the system instead retention isn’t great, we put a lot of effort into onboarding but after the polish members are thrown into deep end in autonomy people complained about getting easy tasks we need to develop our members, this is hard, we dont have management experience, management stuff is a lot of time, most people dont wanna be managers most of warg’s management is sorta good enough will get a lot of push back from people who want the interesting engineering when pushing for dedicated managers we are hour constrainted, more managers is more inefficiency low amounts of glue work is hurting warg https://noidea.dog/glue monthly system time for questions, more of a presentation and explanation with diagrams, from tech dir Nathan Green for thoughts here
Do we all agree with this? this is big … This is an interpretation of Team Charter , do we agree? my examples are mostly ee related but arguments extrapolate to all subteams
Systems Meeting Next Major Projects Baby steps to learn and improve as we go!! Pegasus is for two competition seasons, this one and next Fixed wing (then maybe VTOL) program is on the side no proper plan, we discuss after comp, start simple, learn over time smaller scrappy initially then go better over time for anyone confused: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VTOL
do AEAC this year (ofc lol) then once more for sure
Concerns possibly we cant get tasks for all EFS people to work on change name from EFS to firmware “I have no concerns when it comes to the team direction. I think moving to CAN is a great idea and me (and other EE leads I think I can speak for them) emphatically agree that system understanding is a requirement among general members. We have discussed this in our own meetings and have come up with some ideas to remedy this.” -Nolan
|