Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Expand
titleTeam Direction
  • Comp Focusing all projects

    • We want to learn by doing

    • Shift will happen slowly but this is where we want to be

      • zp will continue for now to keep most of EFS team occupied until new projects are properly scoped

  • What we don’t want to be

    • We’re not a research group

    • We’re not a pcb design club

  • Members need to understand the system before they should be given the go ahead for very technical stuff.

    • It’s brutal all our system engineering is wrapped up in a few people.

    • It’s hard to design a board without understanding the application (and even harder if it’s your first board ever)

    • will be discussed next leads meeting, very contentious

    • Daniel Puratich

      • you need to understand what your customer wants before u make a product

      • you need to see use case before implementing

    • R D

      • leads should provide resources and direction

      • we need to have leads who get the system instead

      • retention isn’t great, we put a lot of effort into onboarding but after the polish members are thrown into deep end

      • in autonomy people complained about getting easy tasks

        • new members constantly got easy tasks and not more development

      • we need to develop our members, this is hard, we dont have management experience,

      • management stuff is a lot of time, most people dont wanna be managers

      • most of warg’s management is sorta good enough

      • will get a lot of push back from people who want the interesting engineering when pushing for dedicated managers

      • we are hour constrainted, more managers is more inefficiency

      • low amounts of glue work is hurting warg https://noidea.dog/glue

      • monthly system time for questions, more of a presentation and explanation with diagrams, from tech dir Nathan Green for thoughts here

  • Do we all agree with this? this is big …

    • This is an interpretation of Team Charter , do we agree?

    • my examples are mostly ee related but arguments extrapolate to all subteams

  • Systems Meeting

    • Weekly sync for zeropilot program in addition to aeac? We’re in integration phase now, need mech stuff soon ish

  • Next Major Projects

    • Baby steps to learn and improve as we go!!

    • Pegasus is for two competition seasons, this one and next

      • give us more time for the harder developments for comp after

    • Fixed wing (then maybe VTOL) program is on the side

      • no proper plan, we discuss after comp, start simple, learn over time

      • smaller scrappy initially then go better over time

      • for anyone confused: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VTOL

    • do AEAC this year (ofc lol) then once more for sure

      • , then SUAS? See how competition goes but we figure this out in future

  • Concerns

    • possibly we cant get tasks for all EFS people to work on

    • change name from EFS to firmware

    • “I have no concerns when it comes to the team direction. I think moving to CAN is a great idea and me (and other EE leads I think I can speak for them) emphatically agree that system understanding is a requirement among general members. We have discussed this in our own meetings and have come up with some ideas to remedy this.” -Nolan

...