Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
  • Attendance

  • Frontloaded Topics

    • Onboarding Georgia

    • Role of directors alignment

    • How we intend on splitting the workload

      • Georgia remaining as Ops lead - can handle most admin/logistics

        • Georgia on leads meeting.

      • Who is running flight tests?

        • Nathan carry continue.

      • Who is running arch syncs? (tech director?)

        • continue Nathan.

    • What project management tools we want to use

      • Need to push the use of Asana

      • need to ask people to do stuff more directly

      • use asana for arch syncs

    • Biggest Risks:

      • no onsite directors for winter term, ggggg

        • can’t grab Yuchen, he’s offsiters

      • Trailer trainning for competition

    • Laying out a flight test timeline and key milestones to ensure proper ramp up to competition.

      • We need clear objectives for this fall term bc we will all be offsite in winter which will result in delayed progress imo

      • Objectives for the term wrt:

        • competition

        • fixed wing

          • Directors align on possibility of usage at comp, see discussion here.

          • Flight be EOT? prolly not, see below

        • Pegasus

          • Pushing autonomy

        • ZeroPilot

          • EFS seems ready to run M2 early this term.

            • get them to set deadlines

          • more foam planes this term

          • focus on comp stuff toooooo

    • Do we wanna try to split things based on project?

      • Anni tried this in the past, it didnt work great imo

      • Could be like:

        • Nathan: Ground Station, Tracking Antenna, O-Week thing

        • Georgia: Pegasus 2

        • Daniel: Fixed Wing, E7 Atrium thing

        • Other members are handling other programs adequately without much guidance: houston, foam planes, etc.

        • there are a lot of TODOs that aren’t rlly encompassed by this type of breakdown

  • notes:

    • roster

      • not many yet → 15 so far

      • Worth reaching out to people that fill it out falsely?]

    • avoid flying peggy 1

    • timeline

      • Peggy 2 flight before end of month, flight test on 20th weekend seems best

        • need to order rangefinders

        • no pi, no lighting initially

      • need payload when conops comes out

        • should have conops end of september

      • October 12th, all autonomy hardware done and run some software, hopefully comp related

        • integration test mostly, doesn't need to be special

      • Aim for fixed wing first flights just after comp

        • gives us time to focus on comp

        • focus on fixed wing right after comp, before we get conops

      • After comp 2025 conops release

        • decide VTOL or run Peggy again

      • SUAS

        • limited for 8 people

        • challenge with 2025 is that we dont have a lot of people onsite

        • 2026 tho we could enter in Peggy

          • there will be a ton of us here right after we graduate

          • gives us time to get our money up too

      • no other comps r rlly viable

        • ran through some not rlly worth it

    • leads meeting

      • what is purpose

      • alternate weeks, ask leads what they think

    • we setup asana a bit, will wait for more stuff to come out

      • arc syncs in 2103

    • named fixed wing eclipse.

    • mech timeline to push

      • comp payload top priority

      • no fixed wing deadlines this term, will discuss more later. maybe winter term mech will be less bogged down so push deadlines then

    • socials

      • 2 general socials, do the rest by subteam

      • fire pit was chill, low attendance

    • ee team

      • two leads unless someone is stepping down in which three is fine

      • one hour per day average, set expectation

    • autonomy

      • push comp stuff early

      • push testing

      • important this comp

    • ops recruitment

      • setting up the books

      • getting members and keeping them engaged

      • learn blast

    • nitpicky

      • team being very nitpicky on design stuff

      • delegating stuff better

      • culture is important

    • force all subteams to have a weekly work session

    • force one subteam specific social per term