Priorities for Other
...
Programs
Tracking Antenna
- new PCBACAN to PWM for servos
CAN to lighting for competition airframenew PCBA coming in this term next month ish
need to finalize groundside comp package (polish software and integration test w/ wifi)
hardware agnostic
https://warg.365.altium.com/designs/BAA43D18-D61B-477A-A049-0D788FA35A7D
keyboard controlled - no compass based
did we resolve the servo stuff
test on physical hardware
pass drone coordinates by wifi
CAN to lighting
for competition airframe and fixed wing
people are assigned
AP_PERIPH w/ custom mavlink?
can test on a nucleo
comms for comp
gemini stuff?
gemini board might be dead bc powerred without antennas
need to profile the gemini boards for link stats
need to use it more to see what’s going on
waiting for mech tracking antenna → flight test with and without yagis
how are we r&d telemetry over elrs?
want to use gemini or gemX for comp, have a COTS module
CAN to PWM
for servos on fixed wing
not comp intent
CAN to DSHOT
Not comp intent
Internal Priorities
ZeroPilot
Why are we re-arching?
current ZeroPilot seems to be built in a very ad hoc fashion
many parts seem to be implemented in their own way, product is not cohesive
potential for integration issues in the future as we pull more and more things together
option A: full send it and deal with problems when we get to them
option B: finish M2/3 with current arch while slowly migrating logic over
Is M2 done? M2 and M3 flight at the same time?
Testing on ZP3 Hardware?
Assembling foam fixed wing two motors
Flight when?
Infra
Advisors
Member
...
Engagement
better for some projects while worse for others
leads get hands on as oppose to just delegation?
give projects more drive/direction
Derek Tang will try this with ZeroPilot
Work Sessions]
we got tired and the notes fell off