Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Expand
titleComp Selection Criteria

Anything in this box please critique/discuss, comp selection processes should be scrutinized pretty hard so we can make it better (thumbs up)

  • How many people, from which subteams, etc.

  • Looking at 14-16ish people? or 10-12?

    • this has definitely been discussed before. make a decision if possible

  • the ‘process for selecting competition-goers’ documentation should be made easily available start of fall term, with expectations outlined pretty clearly.

  • How to choose / limit people?

    • Self-nomination/interest form (self id, leads discretion)

    • Want people for each role? (need to clearly define what tasks exist and what needs to occur)

    • Rated on contribution - subteam leads decision may not be complete law.t

    • Either nominated by director, or someone else on a subteam.

    • Leads will likely know quickly yes/no for whether or not someone should go.

      • cutting down to meet #'s will be harder. Needs to be decision made as a team?

      • Probably easy if set nomination deadline, subteam leads come to meeting with shortlists, then decide

    • List of roles / stuff to do

      • Can find group of people to do a bunch of stuff isn’t of fitting people into pre-defined roles.

  • Competition Roster Selection Guide - Administration - WARG (atlassian.net)

  • @xierumeng to draft

  • Conall Kingshott to draft

  • Megan Spee to draft

  • Draft to review @ next leads meeting (before first day of school sep 6)

  • 4Mx4M space @ comp 🤔

...