Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 8 Next »

Risk Identification (use to brainstorm risks)

Think about the follow categories when creating a list of risks:

Technical: Requirements, Technology, Interfaces, Performance, Quality

External: Customer, Contract, Market, Supplier

Organizational: Project Dependencies, Logistics, Resources, Budget

Project Management: Planning, Schedule, Estimation, Controlling, Communication

đźź© added to Analysis and Response

General Failures

  1. đźź© Part delivery is much slower than expected, pushing back testing and therefore project deadlines

  2. Members miss deliverable due to increased work load

  3. Schedule didn’t allow for multiple iterations to occur, now we’re stuck with a less-than-ideal product

  4. 🟩 The drone isn’t competitive

  5. The drone crashing during competition

  6. battery level low

Electronic Failures

  1. Wires disconnecting

  2. Boards shorting

  3. static electricity (possible ground plane)

  4. Inclement weather during flight (limit flight window)

  5. Antenna Brownout (search pattern)

  6. hardfault (failover)

Software Failures

  1. Sens failure (glide)

  2. autopilot failure (pilot takeover)

  3. fly by wire failure

  4. telemetry lost (follow VFR & divert)

  5. controls/PID failure

  6. RC link lost (divert and glide)

  7. Landing Pad not found

  8. heading lost

Risk Analysis (use to understand impact)

The risk score is based on two axis, Probability and Impact. Use the following chart to understand where a risk falls based on these two factors.

SEVERITY

PROBABILITY

ACCEPTABLE
Rating: 10

TOLERABLE
Rating: 50

EXTREME
Rating: 100

IMPROBABLE (0%-30%)

Score: 3 (low)

Score: 15 (low)

Score: 30 (Medium)

UNLIKELY (30%-60%)

Score: 6 (low)

Score: 30 (Medium)

Score: 60 (High)

POSSIBLE (60%-80%)

Score: 8 (low)

Score: 40 (Medium)

Score: 80 (Extreme)

PROBABLE (80%-100%)

Score: 10 (Low)

Score: 50 (High)

Score: 100 (Extreme)

Use the following table to analyze each risk brought up in the “Risk Identification” stage

Risk Event

Related Subteam

Probability % (P)

Severity Rating (S)

Risk Score (P*S)

XXX

Competition paperwork isn’t finished on time leading to not being able to compete

all

Possible

Extreme

Extreme 80

The competition drone doesn’t fly adequately enough to be competitive

all

Possible

Tolerable

Medium 40

Risk Response (use to mitigate risks)

Any “High” or “Extreme” risks should have an action plan to mitigate any impacts. “Extreme” risks should also have layers of redundancy.

Risk Event

Risk Response

Assignee (RSE)

Competition paperwork isn’t finished on time leading to not being able to compete

  • Sysint to make sure templates and the bones of the report is finished

Hamza Ali to finish the rough draft for the report

The competition drone doesn’t fly adequately enough to be competitive

  • Iterate designs and test code by scheduling test flights and organizing different key areas to test each flight

Aaron Dyck (Deactivated) schedule flights and help with organizing flights

Risk Monitoring (use to document risks)

What risks actually happened? Document them and add them to the risk analysis for insight on future deadlines.

Risk Event
What happened?

Risk Impact
What consequence(s) occurred?

Future Mitigation
What can you do to prevent this from happening again?

Deadline for competition drone timeline went over

  • We don’t have a good way to keep track of deadlines, or see how other late deliverables affect the overall timeline

  • Prioritize tasks based on importance to not overwork members, while still getting the most important tasks finished

  • No labels