Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

Date

Attendance

F24 Recap

What Went Well?

Presenter

Notes

Alison Thompson

  • New members were onboarded quickly and we seemed to get a few pretty involved

    • Having PMs help with onboarding was suuuuuper helpful

  • More opened ended tasks than normal

  • Po

Smile Khatri

  • Lots of new members and we had engaging tasks.

  • Good mentorship happening from leads/PMs to newer members

  • Work sessions started to get better near the end of term once we had more maching tasks

Sohee Yoon

  • Quick integration for new members (e.g., scheduling bootcamp reviews)

  • For a lot of PDM issues, Smile and Nathan were available right away to help out on discord and in-person

  • We had a good amount of tasks this term that varied in skill level and got a lot of members interested (e.g., some task had multiple people interested in it and that encouraged collaboration too)

Evan Janakievski

  • A decent amount of new members

  • Good progress on competition tasks

  • I think good support from PMs this term

    • Noticed the impact a lot more this term being onsite compared to last term

Nathaniel Li

  • Fast bootcamps led to lots of ready members

  • Tasks were interesting for new members

  • In my own personal experience, PDM issues helped me teach new members best practices for using PDM (very ironic)

  • Members were open to collaborating, especially with new members

Camilo Artigas Alos

  • Great collaboration on most projects, I would say comp was the best. The integration between both payloads and landing gear went great.

  • I really enjoyed the machining work sessions and flight tests were great as well.

  • I received all the support I needed from any PM that assigned me any given task.

What Can We Improve?

Presenter

Notes

In meetings notes

Alison Thompson

Smile Khatri

  • Stay more on top of projects, especially Eclipse (m also guilty of this)

    • If there’s no progress being made on certain tasks, we need to call the shot and just get it done or have a conversation w/ whoever is assigned

  • More engaging work sessions. At the start of the term, work sessions were pretty dead. Idk, maybe we need to create a more fun environment to be in to work (idk how to do this)

  • Don’t be afraid of having tough conversations early on. If you think something won’t get done by EOT, we should talk about it early enough to create a plan.

  • When we have new members, I think we should develop a presentation or invest some time in mech meeting to introduce the team to new members, inform them about all the projects going on and what they can contribute to. I head multiple people who had no idea what projects were going on, or even what the team was doing. I remember autonomy did a presetation at their first meeting, maybe we could do something similar to get everyone (including old and new members) on the same page.

  • PMs to be more involved at work sessions

  • Need to use the mech deadlines callendar more, I don’t think I opened it once during november (this might be just me)

Sohee Yoon

  • I agree with Smile, like PMs should be more involved at work sessions (I’m guilty of this) and flight tests (for me)

  • More communication between PMs if we’re working on the same project (e.g., Eclipse). I know when I got sick, I should’ve communicated with one of you to help out with the Fuselage that way we wouldn’t be behind for the Fuselage

  • This is more for me but as a PM I realized I have a lot of responsibility for the design of parts so I have to be thorough in planning designs and consider the big picture. Planning ahead of time early would make it a lot easier later on

  • I think when we’re planning out projects and deadlines, we should consider the backlog of tasks near midterms and exams. I think we did consider it but still ended up pushing a few CAD reviews

Evan Janakievski

  • Scope of Eclipse changing over time to help speed it up, wasn’t as impactful as we thought it was

    • For future projects, need to definitely come up with full idea before designing so everyone is on the same page, not multiple people working on parts that will relate but not designed to be integrated

  • Documentation can definitely improve

  • Work sessions could be improved

  • More communication

    • Within Mech, but also team as a whole

      • Noticed EE did not give most up to date board or all contraints for some tasks

Nathaniel Li

Camilo Artigas Alos

  • As Smile mentions, documenting work sessions would be benefitial. We can have a PM do a confluence doc for each, so we remember what we couldn’t accomplish and set realistic expectations for the next work session.

  • I believe one of the factors of low work session attendance (at least in the beginning) was the fact they ran at the same time as flight tests, if we could schedule around that (which I think we did towards the end) would probably increase work session attendance.

  • I think creating a more in-depth PDM troubleshooting guide on confluence would be benefitial. I’m mostly thinking about it in terms of a flow chart, if you get this error do this, if this doesn’t work try this and so on.

  • I believe that if PMs/Leads need help with anything they should feel free to reach out to other PMs for help on a given task or project, I feel like this would’ve helped for Eclipse.

  • More socials would be nice to keep the mech team as a community. We should also work on keeping it engaging and as Smile mentioned, a BOT presentation could go a long way.

Admin/Process Ideas

Presenter

Notes

In meetings notes

Alison Thompson

Smile Khatri

  • More organized work sessions? Like we just announce what we’ll work on at mech meeting, but sometimes we don’t get half the stuff done or just end of forgetting about it (maybe a me issue idk). Maybe a document that notes down what’ll get done at the work session, have the sessions be more organized.

Sohee Yoon

Evan Janakievski

  • Work sessions need to become more involved and more organized. Need to make sure things are ready maybe a week and a half in advance

    • Do we want to do more drawings for parts, so they are ready whenever needed?

  • Projects need to have a general idea/design from the start, not iterated upon and have integration be a struggle

Nathaniel Li

Camilo Artigas Alos

Action Items/Next Steps for Current Projects

Who

What

Notes

Projects for W24

Project

Sub-Projects

Comp 2025

  • Frame

  • Payload

  • Electronics Cases

  • Weather proofing?

Ground Station

  • Tracking Antenna

  • IMACS Groundstation

Fixed Wing

  • Frame + Integration

  • Wings

  • Propulsion

  • Fuselage

  • Tail

  • Landing Gear

VTOL

  • Frame + Integration

  • Wings

  • Propulsion

  • Fuselage

  • Tail

  • Landing Gear

Roles for W24 Term

What projects are people interested in managing?

Member

Project

Comp 2025 Frame

Comp 2025 Payload

Comp 2025 Electronics Cases

Tracking antenna

IMACS Groundstation

Fixed wing frame + integration

Fixed wing wings

Fixed wing propulsion

Fixed wing fuselage

Fixed wing tail

Fixed wing landing Gear

Composites Development

VTOL frame + integration

VTOL wings

VTOL propulsion

VTOL fuselage

VTOL wing tail

VTOL Landing Gear

Next Meeting

  • No labels