4in1 vs individual ESC decision
Status | Not started |
Owner | @Andy Meng |
---|---|
Contributors | |
Approved | |
Due date | |
Decision |
|
On this page |
Problem statement
The current drone can be designed with one of two esc types in mind, either each motor controlled by its own, seperate esc, or all motors linked together to one 4-in-1 esc.
Research insights
Solution hypothesis
The decision made must consider and optimize both cost of the esc(s) required to drive all motors as well as modularity should it need to be replaced.
Design options
| Individual ESCs | 4-in-1 ESCs | |
---|---|---|---|
Overview | Each ESC is its own PCB, and must be provided with its own power, signal, and ground wiring as well as connection to the motor. Typically they are mounted on the arms of the drone. | All 4 motors are driven from the same PCB. It only needs one set of power leads, and typically all 4 motor input pins are broken out into a single connector. They are typically mounted in the center of the airframe, equidistant from all motors. | |
Screenshot |
| ||
Link |
| ||
Benefits and risks | Should one motor’s ESC break, only that ESC has to be replaced. They are typically mounted on the arms where they are more easily accessible. The cost of 4 individual ESCs is typically greater than the cost of one equivalent 4-in-1 ESC. | Cost is lower Less wiring, easier to manage Harder to replace (and more expensive, as all 4 ESCs will need to be replaced even if only one dies) since the ESC has more wiring connected to it, and is most likely nestled inside the airframe as opposed to on the arms. | |
Criteria | |||
|
|
|
Follow up
Decision | Status | Next steps |
---|---|---|
The 4-in-1 ESC will be used, but design considerations must be made such that the component is still replaceable as needed. Notably, all wiring should use connectors rather than having any component directly soldered to the ESC. | decided | Select a specific ESC to use for project phoenix. |
|
|
|
Source files
Type /link to add links to design files.