Online group Conops Notes
form factor / modularity
fixed wing with 4 rotors
Â
1 v 2 drones
I dont think its a good idea to make 2 different drones, build wise, electrical wise, fw wise, it doubles our work for very little benefit in my opinion
Flight control
zero pilot. Unless ZP fails to meet requirements, I don't see a point in using an off the shelf controller when we're already developing ZP and LOS.
Power
Swap out batteries in a way such that the flight controllers and connectivity devices dont lose power and reboot.
high speed
I think a hybrid VTOL fixed wing will meet our requirments if we can get it working. It means higher speeds than a multirotor, and being able to VTOL will help with the landing pads
pathfinding
VN300 has GPS and IMU, and the next iteration of ZP has backup ports for GPS and IMU if that fails (IIRC). LOS should have our old drivers for that as well (I think)
Autonomous Landing
I think if we have a VTOL, we can have a camera mounted on the bottom that can use the jetson and atleast decide whether to land based on the color, and then get us right on top of the pad. I think its a reasonable goal.
Managing weight
maybe 3d printed housing for the dolls to save weight
Aircraft footprint
fixed wing with 4 rotors for vtol
passengers
6 boxes holding the dolls. Well get less points for realism, but there are points for secure housing and holding 6 passengers.
I think its worth it lose points on realism to ensure that we can store all 6 dolls securely and be able to quickly remove them. If we are able to realistically store 6 passengers thats great. Im concerned that having a door will make it harder to load and unload dolls.
Accurate flight
VN300 + camera
ground station should have a map with the flight path on it and the drones position constantly updated.
Sensors
CV camera
Pilot camera
VN300 (GPS and IMU)
LIDAR for landing
Connectivity
Xbees for sending GPS, IMU data
CV might need xbees too (unless onboard jetson)
IIRC IMACS has a seperate video feed for the pilot
Pilot controller