2023-10-14: Pegasus Hover, ZP3.5 M1, & Pilot Trainning
Hardy Yu
Yuchen Lin
Smile Khatri
Introduction
Houston Flight:
Provide new pilot @Hardy Yu with flight training time.
Houston for pilot training in stabilize mode
Pegasus Hover Test:
Ensure Pegasus flies without oscillations in stabilize, altitude hold, and position hold flight modes.
Pegasus successfully hover and under the control from pilot
Tubie Flight:
Verify ZP3.5 software is functional for fixed wing flight
Tubie form aircraft installed with ZP3.5 firmware is able to fly
Flight Test was requested on October 10th as a part of AEAC runup plan by @Daniel Puratich .
This timeline is Heavily Weather Dependent and consequently dates and times will not be explicitly specified, merely the order of events. @Hardy Yu and @Daniel Puratich leading schedule coordination.
Week before checklist
Morning of checklist
Gather at the bay
pre-departure checklist
Pre flight briefing
Drive to location
Pre-flight Houston
Houston Training Flight
Pre-flight Pegasus
Pegasus Flight
Pre-flight Tubie
Tubie flight
debrief
Resources
List contains all possible human resources available for flight test support!
@Daniel Puratich
Role:
Flight Test Lead
Flight Test Director
Safety
Tubie Pilot
Documentation Director
Electrical
Justification
TC Basic
US HAM
Exec Director
Flight test Requestor
@Nathan Green
Role
Pegasus Pilot
Houston Pilot
Driver
Justification:
TC Basic
Flight Experience
SDC approved driver
@Aaditya Chaudhary
Role
Tubie Pilot
Justification:
TC Basic
ZP3.5 / EFS Lead
@Hardy Yu
Role:
Flight Test Coordinator
Houston Pilot
Justification:
TC Basic
Coordination Experience
@Aidan Bowers (Deactivated)
Role:
Tubie Pilot
Pegasus Pilot
Justification:
TC Basic
Flight Experience
@Yuchen Lin
Role:
Telemetry Manager (RFD900)
Justification:
Experience with RFD900 configuration and setup
ZP3.5 software developer
@Conall Kingshott
Role:
Driver
Mechanical Manager
Justification:
Drivers license
Mech Lead
@Alison Thompson
Role:
Mechanical Member
Justification:
Experienced Mech Member
@Georgia Westerlund
Role:
Photographer
Justifications:
Photography Experience
Ops + Media Lead
@Ayoung Eun
Role:
Tubie Manager (Nucleo/Software)
Justification:
EFS lead
ZP3.5 software developer
@Nathan Green Personal Vehicle (1 driver + 4 passengers + aircraft room)
@Daniel Puratich
@Georgia Westerlund
@Ayoung Eun
SDC Rev 4 will not be available
@Conall Kingshott Personal Vehicle (1 driver + 3 passengers + carrying room)
@Hardy Yu
@Alison Thompson
We do not have our usual WRESTRC booked. @Hardy Yu decided upon 43°28'23.4"N 80°34'01.8"W and approved following discussion in Discord!
Procedure
Debrief
@Hardy Yu to ensure telemetry data we get is uploaded in accordance withData Handling
@Georgia Westerlund to ensure photos are uploaded to Media Folders (Photos & Videos)
Links to uploaded data should be linked to here!
@Daniel Puratich Directing this section of flight test post mortem!
LTE telemetry works
doesnt cut out like the rfd did
is very fast
logs saved to sd card on pixhawk
lack of expensive damage
sub 100 dollars worth of damage
pegasus airframe is fine
zeropilot software worked!
EFS M1 Satisfied
good photos & videos
over 300 photos
videos of all flights
Checklists were written and followed carefully during flight test and day before flight test
Pilot (@Daniel Puratich) review of dual motor style tubie foam plane
only experience prior to this with fixed wing was simulator
plane was as responsive as the snappy models is the real flight evolution simulator
do not play with the under powered or heavy models
it was pretty surprising because it doesn't look like it should be so responsive
80% throttle was too much on takeoff, the 50% advice was very good
with two motors plane had a lot of thrust, felt like it could fly with 25% throttle
was a pretty windy day but still pre responsive
think that wing spar would’ve helped with controllability
The folding that occurred in the video was when banking out of the wind
@Daniel Puratich Directing this section of flight test post mortem!
Confluence document for this flight test should’ve been executed sooner instead of a few days before
Coordinating tasks via discord was effective, but not as clear as it couldve been
Houston didnt have transmitter installed and couldnt fly.
we need another receiver to avoid modifying our aircraft
@Daniel Puratich Directing this section of flight test post mortem!
Pegasus Crashed
flipped when on ground or shortly after takeoff
damage
two props are chewed up
sma conns on lte hat broken
Root cause was motor order set incorrectly
Need to ensure that motor order is correct during motor test, add to checklist
Was validated by hearing motors spin when rotating aircraft on ground
We changed motor direction at the flight test location we did not catch the motor order being incorrect
Motor order A,b,c,d & 1,2,3,4 should be added to checklist
For the record, this time around we did perform multiple motor tests in the bay and multiple motor tests at the field as required by thr above checklists, however, none of us realized this was awry. We also adjusted drone orientation in the bay to gauge response but were judging by ear and incorrectly analyzed that it seemed correct. More attention needs to be paid during these steps.
Tubie Crash
Wing folded in half when turning out of directly into the wind
Tubie airframe types need a wingspar instead of just foam
All of these major issues should be addressed via Root Cause Analysis Forms:
@Daniel Puratich Directing this section of flight test post mortem!