AEAC 2024 Phase 2 Presentation

Slide 1: Project Pegasus - @Daniel Puratich

  • Six to Eight presenters total so we get "most" of the team in there per CONOPs requirement

  • Ten minutes total 

Slide 2-4: Our Team - @Daniel Puratich

  • Present yourself and all team members pictured

Slide 5: Project Pegasus - Aidan Bowers

  • Each step of Project Pegasus’ development, from the design phase to the manufacturing phase, followed our three core design principles: Efficiency, Reliability, and Comfort.

Slide 6: Efficiency - @Nathan Green

  • Introduce efficiency section

Slide 7: Airframe Design - @Nathan Green

  • The initial design of Project Pegasus took the shape of a standard quadcopter, as it proved to be the most efficient configuration with respect to current draw, voltage sag, and energy consumption throughout all phases of flight.

  • The airframe was designed with modularity as a point of focus, with each arm secured to the aluminum center block with two bolts each. The passenger and cargo cabin is mounted to the bottom plate using a standard mounting pattern. This makes Project Pegasus the best choice for easy repairs and minimal maintenance.

  • The frame is lightweight, designed to be constructed from carbon fiber parts.

Slide 8: Airframe Manufacturing - @Smile Khatri

  • These parts were custom made by WARG’s mechanical team using a precise manufacturing standards and procedures.

Slide 9: Aerodynamics - @Smile Khatri

  • The aerodynamic design of the system was developed using an iterative design approach, accounting for both computational simulation results, in-flight telemetry, and pilot feedback.

  • This makes Project Pegasus the leading choice for aerodynamic efficiency.

Slide 10: Système final - @Emma Chan

  • Le système final que nous présentons répond à tous les besoins essentiels de Big City:

    • L’entretien quotidien est minimal

    • Les points de défaillance sont choisis pour réduire les coûts de reconstruction.

    • En cas d’une faute, le système peut être réparé rapidement pour limiter les délais de transport.

  • Bref, Pegasus est le choix idéal pour l’efficacité.

Slide 11: Comfort - @Evan Janakievski

  • Introduce comfort section

Slide 12: Cabin Design - @Evan Janakievski

  • Pegasus’ cabin was especially designed to prioritize passenger comfort.

  • Windows were added to three sides of the cabin to provide passengers with a scenic view during their flight; the locations of these windows were carefully chosen to optimize the passenger experience.

  • The cargo bay was placed behind the last row of seats, ensuring that heavy luggage is stowed up and out of the way.

  • The cabin’s door doubles as an onramp for easy boarding and to accommodate passengers with mobility restrictions.

Slide 13: Passenger Security - @Nathaniel Li

  • At WARG, our top priority is the safety of Big City’s passenger.

  • Each passenger is given a seatbelt to ensure their safety during their travels.

  • The cabin shape was tuned via aerodynamic simulations to reduce the amount of turbulence experienced by the passengers.

  • Lastly, Project Pegasus has a sensor suite dedicated to airborne and ground-based “sense-and-detect”. This ensures that all obstacles are avoided effectively to avoid all crashes.

Slide 14: Reliability - @Hardy Yu

  • Introduce reliability section

Slide 15: Control Links - @Hardy Yu

  • Unlimited range

  • Low latency LTE link for telemetry

  • Long range point-to-point solution for manual control

Slide 16: Testing Program - @Yuchen Lin

  • Development Time: 12 months

  • Successful Validation Flight Tests: 20

  • Zero major incidents

Slide 17: Task 1 Execution - @Tong Zhang

  • Introduce task 1 execution

Slide 18: Task 1 Execution - @Tong Zhang

  • Three laps are being targeted based on our testing

  • Battery capacity is the limiting factor, not time

  • Chosen speed of 10m/s and gradient descent path optimised for efficiency

  • Seven minutes minimum allocated for pre-flight safety checklists

Slide 19: Task 2 Execution - @Daniel Puratich

  • Introduce task 1 execution

Slide 20: Task 2 Execution - @Daniel Puratich

  • Takeoff and approach is done autonomously

  • Landing will be performed manually

  • Targeting LZ C landing pad with 20 seconds to spare

Slide 21: Thank you! - @Daniel Puratich