Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

This document describes the promotion process to the role of subteam lead or director. This typically occurs after a subteam lead or director announces their decision to step down from WARG leadership: Lead Offboarding Process

Transparency

The spirit of this promotion process is to be transparent and fair to ensure WARG leadership integrity.

Process

Please follow the

If you’re a lead and looking to step down and promote someone in your place please follow the below process:

...

Leads and directors consider how they are feeling regarding stepping down

  • Please refer to Lead Term Guidelines when making your decision and speak with your peers

  • Ideally this is done around the start and end of each term and expressed in discussion during beginning or end of term director/lead syncs

Leads discuss intention to step down with directors and leadership team and announce to subteam

...

Nomination process is induced

...

  • For example, suppose the week before reading week is week 8, then the nomination will begin from week 1 and end at week 7.

...

Process:

  1. Create nomination form

    1. Nomination form must contain all of the following:

      1. Name and subteam of the nominator

      2. Name and subteam of the nominee

      3. Position that the nominee is nominated for (e.g. EFS lead)

      4. Optional field for explanation by the nominator

    2. For example: https://forms.gle/Mcz3bUFervzfAKqZ8

...

Prospective leads speeches

...

This is optional but should be considered for director or competitive subteam lead votes

...

  1. Announce open position and nomination period in Discord and/or a subteam meeting

  2. Nomination period

    1. Members make submissions using the nomination form

    2. Ideally, this period is open for 4 weeks after the announcement

  3. Optional candidate speeches

    1. Recommended if there is competition for the position

    2. Candidates make a 5 minute speech at

...

    1. leads meeting

...

Leadership team discussion

  • Generally done during a leads meeting

  • Discussion should be focused around:

    • Candidates position regarding: Skillset Levelling Rubric

    • Candidates time on the team

      • Generally we consider one term as a minimum for prospective subteam leads to get a feel for how the team operates, however, in extreme circumstances, notably Restarting WARG, this isn’t required.

      • For Director generally the candidate should have been a subteam lead for at least 2 terms.

  • These discussions should be handled in private (can ask non-leads to leave leads meeting) with respect to Private Communications

  • During the private discussion, the remaining leads should

    • identify 3 strengths

      • why is the candidate a good fit?

    • 3 potentials

      • what does the candidates need to improve on?

...

Leadership team voting

  • Ideally voting is completed a week prior to reading week

  • Generally done during a leads meeting

  • Voting will be anonymous.

  • Each vote is either Yes or No.

    • There is no neutral/abstain option.

    • Leads that are not present ? (idk how we handle this)

  • Voting platform options:

    • Strawpoll

    • Slido

    • Kahoot

  • The winning candidate must have at least 2/3 votes of the council (rounding up)

    • eg if we have 13 team leads, then we need >= 9 votes

  • The winning candidate must have more votes than any competitors

  • If there is a tie between the candidates, we will go back to the discussion phase and then vote again

  • Team Exec will pick at most 2 candidates for one position during the Team Exec review period. (If two positions are available then we will pick at most 4 candidates for voting)

  • If multiple candidates are eligible, the voting will be in parallel, which means that each candidate will be treated as a separate voting process. You can vote for both of them, which means that you are equally happy about either candidate being the lead. For example, if both Candidate A and Candidate B are eligible, then we will vote on A first, and then another vote for B, then the team exec will collect the result and check the vote with rule #2 & #3. If there is a tie, then rule #4 applies

...

New lead is onboarded by existing leads for some time before lead steps down

  • ideally this is the remainder of the term following reading week

    • eg. Voting for the lead for S23 will be decided one week before the reading week of W23.

    • This gives plenty of time for the transition to be smooth, worst case it should be a few weeks for handoff

  • Subteam Lead Onboarding &Director Onboarding are merely a starting place

  • When a new lead is being onboarded they should have all the discord roles and everything just in a transition phase. Ideally at the start of the terms everything becomes official with respect to Lead List

...

Explain to other non-selected candidates the reasonning

  • Explain why they were not selected and the long term plans for the subteam

...

Exit Interview

  • When someone steps down from being subteam lead directors should conduct a brief exit interview to gsther some thoughts with the goal of imptoving team in future

  • When a director steps down there should be some sort of director sync wth the new directors with the same goal and offer time for some long term context to be transferred.

Ask directors to update your discord roles as desired

  1. WARG leadership discusses the candidates in a private leads meeting as per Private Communications

    1. Promotion criteria:

      1. Subteam Lead Promotion Criteria

      2. TODO Director criteria

    2. For each candidate, identify at least 3 strengths and 3 areas of improvement using the promotion criteria

  2. WARG leadership votes as per Team Charter (DRAFT)

    1. Typically during a leads meeting

    2. Each candidate is voted upon, and all voting is done in parallel

      1. For example: Alice and Bob are candidates for the position of executive director. The directors create 2 polls, 1 for Alice and 1 for Bob, and send both at the same time to WARG leadership

    3. The typical platform of choice is Strawpoll: https://strawpoll.com/

    4. Must be yes or no, abstain is not allowed

    5. “At least” is semantically equivalent to “greater or equal to”. For example:

      1. 8/11 >= 2/3 so it’s a pass, but 7/11 is not

      2. 8/12 >= 2/3 so it’s a pass, but 7/12 is not

      3. 9/13 >= 2/3 so it’s a pass, but 8/13 is not

    6. If 2 or more candidates have passed:

      1. The candidate with the most yes votes is selected for promotion

      2. If there are 2 or more candidates tied with the most yes votes, WARG leadership discusses those candidates only and votes again, repeating as many times as necessary

  3. The selected candidate gains all roles, permissions, accesses, and responsibilities immediately, but is not yet officially part of WARG leadership until the start of the next term

    1. Onboarding:

      1. Subteam Lead Onboarding

      2. Director Onboarding

    2. After the start of the next term, the selected candidate is added to Lead List and starts participating in the lead promotion process

      1. Before this, the selected candidate is encouraged participate in other leads meetings

  4. Inform the other candidates that they are not selected

    1. Explain why they are not selected and the long term plans of the subteam/WARG leadership