Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

Framework Requirements to overtake Simulink

  • Resources, community support

Simulator requirements

  • Able to integrate C code (ZP3)

  • Able to simulate wind/imu/noise

  • Visualize simulation, (able to import CAD model for later models, not important right now)

  • Able to reitarate models easily

  • Accurate dynamic/physic model

  • Manual inputs / Real-time inputs?

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

8pm

Revalidating previous architecture proposal

See Simulator

8:15pm

State requirements

  1. Replacing driver files… or rewrite HAL code to run ZP3

  2. See Unity integration with MATLAB/Simulink

8:20pm

ZP3 Integration

8:35pm

IMACS Integration



8:45pm

FreeRTOS Integration

8:55pm

ZP3 submodule/Repo structure

  • PID Tuning for Attitude Manager? (Need accurate model to have accurate PID values)

  • Big challenge; finding parameters

Milestones

  • Revalidate framework, 1 week, MS#1

  • Verifying flowchart / architecture, 1-2 weeks, MS#2

  • Researching on fixed-wing dynamics, MS#3

  • Pretty decent fixed-wing simulator model, 2-3 months?, MS#4

    • Very simple model working (then reiterate with bit more complex model), MS#3a

    • Taking input from ZP3’s output, MS#3b

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels