Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Status

NOT STARTED / IN PROGRESS / COMPLETE

Impact

HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW

Driver

Approver

Contributors

Informed

Due date

Resources

\uD83D\uDCDA Relevant data

\uD83D\uDCD8 Background

\uD83C\uDF08 Options considered

Option 1

Option 2

Description

SD via SPI

SD SDMMC

Pros and cons

(plus) Protocol that FW is familiar with

(plus) Fewer physical pins

(minus) Uses a SPI port that could be used for something else

(plus) Built in data validation & redundancy

(minus) Harder to write FW for ('non-standard')

🔖 SDMMC Packet Overhead: 48 bits from host, 48 bits from SD card, 16 bits

Estimated cost

LARGE

MEDIUM

✅ Action items

\uD83C\uDF1F Outcome

  • No labels