/
Cell Monitor

Cell Monitor

 


Edit: 2/26/2025, @Chenxuan Yuan


Weight Optimization

Passive vs Active Balancing

  • 99% confident that passive balancing is preferred for our use case

Passive

  • Most small UAV BMS units use passive balancing where excess charge is bled off from higher voltage cells as heat using resistors to equalize cells during charging

  • Lightweight because it’s just resistors and transistors per cell

  • Inefficient because energy is wasted as heat and charging is relatively slow but acceptable if done only during ground charging

Active

  • If we want continuous balancing during in-flight use — probably not

  • Redistributes energy from higher voltage cells to lower ones using inductors+capacitors

  • Energy efficient and allows for in-flight balancing but has much more complex circuitry and additional weight — overkill

BMS Features

  • Cell balancing

  • Over-voltage (OV) & Under-voltage (UV) protection

  • Over-Current (OC) & Short-Circuit protection

  • Over-temperature (OT) & Under-temperature (UT) protection

  • Cell voltage measurements/monitoring

Fuel Gauge - SoC & SoH

  • For highly accurate State-of-Charge (SoC) and State-of-Health (SoH)

  • Do we really need? Estimating SoC and SoH from voltage/current/temp data from BMS should be enough for us

BMS ICs (for 12S pack)

Top Contenders:

  1. MP2791 — more integrated, less work (integrated control logic, charging&protection, so reduced need for MCU to handle low level battery management decisions)

  2. https://www.ti.com/product/BQ76940 — more modular

Other:

ST/Infineon options often designed for automotive or industrial applications, might be over-integrated for heavy duty applications and more complex

 

Some links

Related content