LED Board Rev 4
Intro
Who
@Daniel Puratich owning the altium grind here and arch
What
Start from LED Board Rev 3 and only make the following changes
Neopixel should be on a different pin
it can be on any of the following: PA8, PA9, PA10, PA5, PA3, PA2, PA1. These correspond to TIM1, TIM2 CH1-4 respectively. Whichever is easiest layout wise
PA5 was selected as it was the closest to the old pin
Switch to brighter Neopixels
See here
Fix the layout concerns
there’s a few minor comments in the last one
high level layout placement concept should remain, we like it.
schem styling
there’s a few minor comments in the last one
Testing in meantime on rev 3
CAN circuit should work, does AP_PERIPH communicate with Pixhawk?
photoshoot should be done with constant color, firmware and wiring
Boards don’t smash when mounted on Pegasus 2 from flight vibration
Timeline
Nov 1 midterm board order
Assembled into next term
Where
github link
Engineering
LED Options
These two were selected as the primary candidates for the board as they’re commonly used and more powerful that the current implementation. They’re larger than the LEDs used in rev 3, however, the extra space is available. The need for extra power was needed as the LEDs in rev 3 weren’t bright enough. Ultimately, the SKC6812-RV was selected as the LED for this revision as it’s brighter than the WS2812B and costs a bit less.
The WS2812B operating at full power has an average brightness of 1285 mcd. While under the same conditions the SKC6812-RV has an average brightness of 1735 mcd. Furthermore, as the LEDs are the same size, the perceived brightness will be the same.
SKC6812-RV (1655)
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Brighter on average than the WS2812B by ~35% | Larger than current implementation |
Low cost; 0.70$ each on digikey (only purchased in strips of 10) | High current draw of ~60mA at maximum power. (Current implementation draws ~48mA) |
Operate on the same logic level as the current implementation |
|
WS2812B (COM-16347)
COM-16347 | DigiKey Electronics
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
We used it in revision 1 and it functioned well. | Larger than current implementation |
Common for hobbyist projects and is known to be very bright | High current draw of ~60mA at maximum power. (Current implementation draws ~48mA) |
Low cost; 0.93$ each on digikey |
|
|
|