ELRS Gemini Xrossband TX
Owner: @Ishman Mann
ToDo:
Curve RF traces (if higher fab cost is acceptable)
consider a generic config that supports existing firmware, is there one that uses only 2 LR221s
Come up w/key features and Modify the schematic by @Nolan Haines for groundside TX applications
Create a corresponding layout
I should rotate U11 90 degrees clockwise
Table of Contents
Background
This board will take the best parts of ELRS Gemini TX and ELRS Redundant Diversity RX, and combine them into a groundside TX. Likely this board won’t use Diversity TX (which doesn’t really exist), but Xrossband.
Ideas
something like Xrossband would be pretty cool. It's the next step after Gemini in terms of TX. Basically have two Geminis on the board, with one at 900-910 MHZ and the other at 2.4-2.44GHz. https://fpvguru.in/blogs/expresslrs-gemini-xrossband-the-future-of-dual-band-fpv-control/ . Hardware wise it could use the same LR221s, main differences would be in firmware
Key references:
LoRa
Needs Assessment
Top goals
Current sense on the tx
Have 2 Geminis (4 LR221s) on the board for Xrossband. Make it compatible with the RX board.
Improve upon the ELRS Gemini TX.
Port over existing features and add new ones
Design to solve/avoid the issue it was having!
Easily programmable
Configurable over UART, WIFI, etc…
Constraints
Size and weight are not limiting factors
Architecture
I probably don’t need the ESP 01F because Xrossband has dual band anyway. But there is a chance I will keep it.
(possibly) Need to have high output power, eg 1W. (But no off the shelf RX can support over 250mW telem). Need to determine appropriate power arch and if the current LR221s are good enough.
→ Seems like the current LR221s on the ELRS Redundant Diversity RX has a TX power of 15dBm max for 900 MHz. Is this enough? DEFINITELY NOT, we need something like 27dBm or 30dBm
^But what about this high gain antenna thing?? → I believe its more directional than a normal antenna, but its worth looking into
Solid option: use an RF amplifier - there are plenty of options and this needs a decision matrix
per https://www.mouser.ca/pdfDocs/LR1121_data_sheet_V1_1.pdf,
Given LoRa’s strict noise requirements, a LNA (low noise amplifier) is needed??? Rx to TX side??
For low frequency amplifier (either 8dBm or 15dBm to achieve 30dBm):
the bigger question is how to use LoRa in a high noise environment, and the solution may lie beyond just power amplification
Another question is if LoRa is already good enough to operate in high noise environments
“operates below noise floor“??
Considering all the laws and technicallity of LoRa, I need to think more deeply about whether to amplify or use some other technique to extend its range in high noise environments
https://chatgpt.com/share/67b8250a-7ba0-800f-bc30-4b8ed33c48f4 ← key discussion
Carefully draft a power architecture. The one in the diagram below is just rough with not much thought yet. Definitely want good isolation where needed, and need to consider power demand
consider dual passband filter of somekind
https://blaauw.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/342/2017/11/472.pdf
If this can somehow be implemented, it would be a lot more cheap than a tunable filter (which I would never add because they’re so niche and expensive)
Im probably not going to add a ESP-01F backpack. It would require having one on the drone side reciever too, which would add to board size on the drone. Likely it wont happen. Xrossband uses 2 frequencies anyway, so why even change it midflight. Thats overkill.
Note about LR221 modules' pins:
Component Selection
Xrossband TX component research:
https://www.mouser.ca/pdfDocs/LR1121_data_sheet_V1_1.pdf
Filters:
Following a dual passband filter system, we could implement LPFs on each transmission line – however, for the lf transmission line, it appears acceptable to use a DC blocking capacitor arrangement instead of a filter (for the selected amplifier below).
Based on the confluence, I am making the assumption that the hf transmission is operating at 13dBm and the lf at 22dBm (option for 15dBm).
Notes I’ll follow when making a selection:
Passband frequencies: 2.4-2.44GHz, 900-910MHz
Power handling requirements:
22dBm for lf
15dBm for hf
Insertion loss: must note when choosing amplifiers
Impedance 50 Ω
Examples which meet these considerations:
For HF: look for a mid frequency of 2.44Ghz:
https://www.lcsc.com/product-detail/SAW-Filters_Taiyo-Yuden-F6HG2G441EG65-J_C2651012.html NOTE: Find one with better stock/ read amplifier datasheets more clearly.
Picked for it’s low insertion loss (1.0dBm), large operating temperature range and adequate power rating (+24dBm) NOTE: THIS MUST BE PLACED IN FRONT OF THE AMPLIFIER
Will require initial tuning
For LF: look for a mid frequency somewhere in the low-mid 900s:
https://www.lcsc.com/product-detail/SAW-Filters_Murata-Electronics-SAFFB942MFL0F0AR1X_C91653.html Will no longer be needed with use of selected amplifier.
Picked for it’s low insertion loss (1.5dBm), large operating temperature range and adequate power rating (+15dBm) NOTE: THIS MUST BE PLACED IN FRONT OF THE AMPLIFIER
Will require initial tuning
Amplifiers:
Concerns: I believe the legal limit on these frequencies is 30dBm? I haven’t done a whole lot of research on this but the variance in insertion loss on the filters paired with an amplifier pushing the power right to the 30dBm line… could cause a higher than legal power output? I’m not sure if it’s significant enough to be of concern.
^^because of this lets aim for 27-29dBm
Considerations:
Impedance 50 Ω
Calculate gain separately for HF and LF
Note linear power output vs saturated power output–maintain linearity. Passing p1dB results in nonlinearity, which produces distortion
Gain Calculation must follow: 28dBm = LoRa Transmission Power - filter insertion loss + gain + Antenna Gain
Gain for HF lines:
Gain = 30 - 22 + 1 = 9dBm
Note: Requires 5V power supply? → can take 3.3V or 5V
Gain for LF lines:
Gain = 30 - 15 + 1.5 = 16.5dBm
Note: No info on supply voltage?
Ishman:
for 2.4GHz: https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/detail/skyworks-solutions-inc/SKY65162-70LF/5214216 amplifier and https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/detail/johanson-technology-inc/2450FM07A0029001T/6187664 low-pass filter
13dBm LR221 source - 0.8dB filter + ~13-to-14dB amplifier + ~2-to-3dB antenna = ~27.2-to-29.2dBm output
NF of amplifier is less than 5dB
for 900MHz: Just forget the use of an amplifier and use the 22dBm LR221 output. Have https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/detail/johanson-technology-inc/0900LP15B0063001E/7943533 low pass filter
22dBm LR221 source -0.9dB filter + ~2-to-3dB antenna = ~23.1-to-24.1dBm output, which is okay for a lower frequency
No amplifier noise added
Test/Validation Plan
Layout Considerations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwNb0ndIT5k&ab_channel=Rogers%27AdvancedElectronicsSolutions
ENIG has more losses than bare copper for coplanar waveguides
https://resources.altium.com/p/microstrip-ground-clearance-how-close-too-close
Note: the main point of a ground pour is manufacturability and shielding, but it may not be desirable everywhere if we want a microstrip configuration instead of waveguide
Manufacturer options:
JLC
PCBWay
bittele (7pcb)
spi on L6, RF on L1, controls on L4
Possible concerns
is 5.5mils too thin for current?
should I use curved traces?
spi as daisy chain better than star?