12S Servo Module

12S Servo Module

 

Status: Active

Current Owner: @Jerry Tian

Previous Owner: @Stanley Hao (Deactivated)

 

 

 

Needs Assessment

The 12S Servo Module is a PDB designed to supply power from the battery directly to the servo motors on the fixed wing plane. The board should step down the voltage from the battery to 5-6V to supply the servo motors and be able to cut one out if it fails, to prevent the dead servo from drawing too much power and depowering other components of the drone.

Example of how the servo motor control the fixed wing tilt angle on the plane
Motor Placements on the fixed wing plane (focus on the servos!)

 

Market Research

  • Existing https://www.revrobotics.com/rev-11-1144/, interesting LED feature can be implemented.

    • see if we can get plane position from gyro?? is a gyro chip too big?

    • or I need to study how to read fixed wing directions from its wing tilt angle?? and we can get this data from servo?? but how to decode!???

    • or simply we just measure current at each servo rail input and mux the color ?? uhh so many ideas I am not even sure if they make sense lol

  • I (Jerry) assumed 1 servo motor draw a maximum of 1A from my previous course project. I saw 1 servo motor would draw around 700mA from power supply. Also saw a bunch of servos in the bay and they look the same size as the one I used in the course project, so I assumed 1A current limit.

Requirements

  • Supports 18 V to 55 V input from XT60 for 6S and 12S support

    • Input should have common mode choke to filter out noise from the ESC

  • 3x4 header servo inputs and outputs to be consistent with Pixhawk Electrical Connector Standards

    • .100 pitch, 100mil

    • Input: PWM, GND from Pixhawk (No 5V power since we are making our own)

    • Output: buffed PWM, Power, GND

  • Each output power is 6 V (possibly adjustable between 5 V and 6 V with passive values) and has a current limit somewhere between 500mA and 1A (possibly adjustable with passive values within this range). If one channel is over currented the other channels remain alive.

    • 5V/6V output can be changed by swapping out resistors

  • 30mm x 30mm PCB size to be compliant with Mounting Hole & Pattern Specifications

 

Block Diagram

Possible Implementation Methods

Single Buck Converter Option

  • A single buck converter with external FETs can be used and then four current limited channels

    • Will need to have the current limit max at 4A

    • Each servo line will have some form of overcurrent protection, which can shut off that line to the servo if the current exceeds a certain limit

4 Buck Converters Option

  • Four separate buck converters with internal FETs can be used, each with their own current limit

  • Adding fuses to each servo line that will trip if the current exceeds allowed parameters?

Methods Pros and Cons

Attribute

Single Buck

4 Bucks

Attribute

Single Buck

4 Bucks

Component Selection

  • Requires a relatively expensive buck controller IC

  • IC usually has more features than what is required for this application

  • more complex circuit layout due to using external FETs

  • Can use buck ICs with internal FETS

  • ICs easier to find since lower current requirements

Cost

  • Probably going to be more expensive due to more high performance components

 

Board Layout / form factor

 

  • Likely going to need to take up more space due to having 3 discrete bucks instead of one

Decision: We selected single buck option to save board space.

Component Selection

Buck ICs

Internal FETs

External FETs (Buck Controllers for single buck option)

MP9928 Buck Controller Specs

Typical Application Circuit Diagram

IC Pinout

  • This IC is available in TSSOP-20 and QFN-20 packages.

 

Important Equations

  • Output voltage divider equation:

Buck Controller Passive Components Selection

Output Feedback Voltage Divider

Vout Current Limit

Since we have overcurrent protection downstream already, we don’t want to implement a limit on the buck controller itself. Unfortunately, the current sensing is used in the compensation control for the buck, so it needs to be included for the IC to function normally.

Vcc Circuit

The MP9926 has VCC1 and VCC2 to power internal components and the MOSFETS. VCC1 can take input from Vin into an internal LDO. To improve efficiency, can connect VCC2 to output and leave VCC1 pin floating.

  • Choose a 4.7 uF capacitor for VCC2

    • 4.7uF is chosen to be compliant with datasheet’s typical application example. This cap decouples noise at VCC2 pin. Other values such as 1uF or 10uF would work as well.

  • Choose 1uF capacitor for VCC1 according to the datasheet

    • VCC1 cap can’t be drained when charging up the bootstrap capacitor, the 1uF cap is chosen since it is 10x bigger than Cboot

 

Power Good Pull-up Resistor

Enable/Sync Pin Pull-up Resistor

  • selected a resistor divider here to regulate EN pin voltage in high Vin situations

    • 1.28V < V_EN < 50V

    • Vin = 18V, R1 = 100kohm, R2 = 100kohm, Vout = 9V

    • Vin = 55V, R1 = 100kohm, R2 = 100kohm, Vout = 27.5V

  • not using a zener diode because the diode footprint takes too much space

AAM/CCM Resistor

  • AAM mode improves the efficiency of the the Buck at light or no load, and since we are powered by a battery, it would make sense to improve the efficiency of the board where possible.

  • Choose 196K resistor, this keeps the V_AAM at 600mV which is above the 480mV (R_FREQ is also 200K so the resistors cancel out which leaves V_AAM at 600mV).

Soft-Start Capacitor

  • Soft-start capacitor is used to determine the soft-start time, prevents converter output voltage from overshooting rated voltages

  • If we want a t_ss of ~100ms, I_ss = 4 uA, V_REF = 0.8V, C_ss = 500nF

Switching Frequency

There is a trade-off when selecting the switching frequency of the buck controller.

High Fsw → Small input and output ripples, smaller inductor and less capacitors but will increase switching losses

Low Fsw → Big inductor but small switching losses

  • Limits: 100kHz - 1000kHz

  • Try to use lowest available frequency (100kHz)

    • Justification (Old): Even with the lowest available frequency available to us, the corresponding recommended inductor size that this corresponds to is just 47uH which isn’t too physically large anyway, and we aren’t very space constrained so larger a couple larger components is okay, thus to maximize efficiency, we can go for the lowest possible switching frequency.

    • Justification: 100kHz switching frequency provides the highest efficiency. It leads to a 47uH inductor which is fitting our 30mm x 30mm board so this switching frequency is acceptable.

  • 199kOhms → selected R_freq = 196kOhm → Fsw = 101.5 kHz

  • Comment:

    • If we ever go for a 2nd revision, start with calculating total losses on the FET and go for the highest Fsw. We want the board size to be small so a smaller inductor and less caps can help with layout. But still watch out for efficiency drops

Inductor

  • V_out = 6V, V_in = 55V, f_s = 101.5kHz, i_ripple = 0.3 * 4A = 1.2A: L = 43.9uH

  • V_out = 6V, V_in = 18V, f_s = 101.5kHz, i_ripple = 1.2A: L = 32.8uH

Inductance & vs Current
  • At 4A, the inductance drops a little from rated 47uH but is still close to 45uH, also the expected temperature remains low, thus this inductor should be sufficient

Input Capacitor

When the switching FETs turn on and off, current suddenly start and stop flowing and this causes ripple on the input side. Due to the parasitic inductance, we see the ripple voltage on Vin and we need to filter that out.

  • Must be capable of handling input ripple current, some power will be dissipated by the capacitor ESR. Typically quoted values of ESR for ceramic capacitors are between 0.01 and 0.1 Ω. The ripple current can be defined as follows:

  • 1.25A@V_in=55V, 1.89A@V_in=18V

  • Voltage rating ideally greater than 100V to compensate capacitor DC bias effect

  • Below: Input capacitance equations from TI appnote:

Duty Cycle
  • See efficiency chart below for duty cycle calculation

    • @V_in = 55V: D = 6/(55*0.85) = 12.8%

    • @V_in = 44.4V: D = 6/(44.4*0.85) = 15.9%

    • @V_in = 22.2V: D = 6/(22.2*0.92) = 29.4%

    • @V_in = 18V: D = 6/(18*0.92) = 36.2%

  • f_sw = 101.5kHz, I_o = 4A

  • To save board space, we decided to go with ceramic capacitor only. Chosen 4 10uF 100V X7S ceramic capacitors as our input capacitors. See the screenshot below for DC bias and Temp Rise due to I_rms.

  • Let Vpp be 2% of Vin, this would yield a Vin_max of 55.55V. There is still 4.5V margin till the Vds_max for our switching FET.

    • Cin @ 55V >= 0.128 * (1 - 0.128) * 4 / (1.1* 0.1015) = 3.86 uF, effective capacitance = 2.22*4 = 8.88uF > 3.86 uF

    • Cin @ 44.4V >= 0.159 * (1 - 0.159) * 4 / (0.888* 0.1015) = 5.74 uF, effective capacitance = 2.9*4= 11.6uF > 5.74 uF

    • Cin @ 22.2V >= 0.294 * (1 - 0.294) * 4 / (0.444* 0.1015) = 17.81 uF, effective capacitance = 5.84*4= 23.36uF > 17.81uF

    • Cin @ 18V >= 0.362 * (1 - 0.362) * 4 / (0.36* 0.1015) = 24.44 uF, effective capacitance = 6.69*4 = 26.76uF > 24.44 uF

 

Added one 0603 0.1uF cap at the buck controller input to match the datasheet guide.

 

Conclusion: We can go with ceramic capacitors only for our design. Vpp_max is 1.1V, which can cause problems at the SW node if the noise frequency matches the converter’s resonance frequency. However, we also have boot resistor, snubber circuit and gate resistor to suppress the SW node ringing.

Comparing Different Capacitor Options

 

Ceramic 250V

Ceramic 250V

(Stacked)

Al Polymer 125V

Al Polymer 160V

Al Polymer 250V

Electrolytic 400V

Film 450V

 

Ceramic 250V

Ceramic 250V

(Stacked)

Al Polymer 125V

Al Polymer 160V

Al Polymer 250V

Electrolytic 400V

Film 450V

Description

CAP CER 2.2UF 250V X7T 2220

CAP CER 3.3UF 250V X7T SMD

CAP ALUM POLY 12UF 20% 125V SMD

CAP ALUM POLY 10UF 20% 160V T/H

CAP ALUM POLY 8.2UF 20% 250V T/H

CAP ALUM 10UF 20% 400V RADIAL

CAP FILM 10UF 10% 450VDC RADIAL

Effective Capacitance @ 18V to 60V (Estimate)

2uF → 1.9uF

3.3uF rated

12uF (no DC bias)

10uF (no DC bias)

8.2uF (no DC bias)

10uF (no DC bias)

10uF (no DC bias)

ESR (mOhms)

--

--

69 @100kHz

110 @100kHz

458 @100kHz

Not in Datasheet

10.9 @10kHz

Price per piece

$4.35

$5.33

$6.57

$2.32

$3.77

$1.17

$8.30

Package

2220

SMD

WxHxL (mm):

5x5x6

SMD (10mm diameter, 10mm height)

Thru-hole cylindrical (8mm diameter, 12mm height)

Thru-hole cylindrical (10mm diameter, 12mm height)

Thru-hole cylindrical (10mm diameter, 20mm height)

Thru-hole rectangular

WxHxL (mm):

15x24.5x31.5

Availability (Digikey)

14k+ in stock

128k+ in stock

5.9k+ in stock

9.4k+ in stock

10k+ in stock

21k+ in stock

18k+ in stock

Quantity Required

4

3

1

1

1

1

1

Total Cost (Per Board)

$17.4

$15.99

$6.57

$2.32

$3.77

$1.17

$8.30

Other Notes

Expensive

Janky

Relatively low stock, rated voltage may be low

Relatively low stock

Relatively high ESR, relatively low stock

Tall, also no ESR rating in DS

Big

 

Selection: Al Polymer 160V CAP ALUM POLY 10UF 20% 160V T/H

Justification:

  • Rated for 160V which should provide ample safety room to the rated 60V design voltage for the board

  • Quite affordable compared to using just ceramic capacitors

  • Space efficient, requires only one to provide adequate capacitance

  • Low ESR, at 110mOhms tested at 100kHz compared to regular electrolytic capacitors

  • Through-hole makes it easier to solder(?)

Small input ceramic capacitor to handle input spikes and phase-node ringing

Output Capacitor Selection

  • Cap impedance should be low at switching frequency (101.5kHz) as the inductor current oscillates at this frequency.

  • Datasheet uses 22uF and 220uF capacitors for 5V application

  • 22uF: GRM21BR61E226ME44K

  • Keep output ripple voltage to a minimum

From datasheet
  • Vout = 6V

  • Vin = 55V

  • f_s = 101.5kHz

  • L = 47uH

  • R_ESR = 0.004R / 3

  • Co = 8.192uF * 3

  • Delta V_out = 0.0562V if put three 22uF capacitors, very quiet Vout, very nice

Compensation Components

  • Assuming we did have a R_sense resistor of 5 mOhms:

    • Gm = 500uA/V

    • Gcs = 1/(12*Rsense) = 16.67

    • Co = 8uF * 3

    • fc = 0.1 * fsw = 10.15kHz

    • Vfb = 0.8V

    • R5 = 1357 Ohms → 1300 Ohms

    • C6 > 49nF → C6 = 100nF

    • C7 = DNP for tuning.

RC Snubber

Purpose: reduces the voltage ringing spike at SW node

How it works:

The PCB trace parasitic inductance and LS FET output capacitance (Coss) forms an LC circuit. The SW node is right in the middle of L and C so it will see a lot of voltage ringing. The snubber circuit serves as a low impedance path for the high frequency voltage oscillations similar to a 1st order RC low pass filter. Half of the energy will be dissipated through Rsnb while HS FET is conducting and the other half will be stored in Csnb. While LS FET is conducting, current will flow out of Csnb and dissipates energy through Rsnb again.

Do we need it?

  • We don't want a transient to damage the switching FET

  • DNP the snubber the circuit for the 1st revision, we will find out if we need them during testing

Research Links:

 

Power FET Selection

MOSFET basics

Requirements

  • Vds > 55V max?

  • Ids > 5A (Id_min = 4.5745A)

  • lower Rds the better

  • Small size → son-8 package

Decision Matrix

Total Switching Loss =  Gate Charge switching loss + Output Capacitance switching loss = 1/2 * Qg * Vgs * fsw + 1/2 * Coss* Vds^2 * fsw

 

Cost

$2.83

$0.83

$1.66

$0.70

$1.48

$1.32

Vds

60 V

100 V

100 V

60 V

60 V

60 V

Ids

71 A

12 A

35 A

10.8 A

13 A

12 A

Gate Charge

9.0 nC

4.9 nC

59 nC

8.4 nC

11.1 nC @ 4.5 V

7.3 nC @ 4.5 V

Rdson

8.8 mohm

150 mohm

28.5 mohm

24 mohm

12.4 mohm

15.6 mohm

Switching Loss

0.5 * 9.0 [nC] * 5 [V] * 100 [kHz] + 0.5 * 640 [pF] * 55 [V] ^2 * 100 [kHz] = 0.09905 [W]

0.5 * 4.9 [nC] * 5 [V] * 100 [kHz] + 0.5 * 36 [pF] * 55 [V] ^2 * 100 [kHz] = 0.00667 [W]

0.5 * 59 [nC] * 5 [V] * 100 [kHz] + 0.5 * 180 [pF] * 55 [V] ^2 * 100 [kHz] = 0.041975 [W}

0.5 * 8.4 [nC] * 5 [V] * 100 [kHz] + 0.5 * 282 [pF] * 55 [V] ^ 2 * 100 [kHz] = 0.0447525 [W]

0.5 * 11.1 [nC] * 4.5 [V] * 100 [kHz] + 0.5 * 19 [nC] * 55 [V] * 100 [kHz] = 0.05475 [W]

0.5 * 7.3 [nC] * 4.5 [V] * 100 [kHz] + 0.5 * 24 [nC] * 55 [V] * 100 [kHz] = 0.06764 [W]

Conducting Loss

4.5745 [A] ^2 * 0.0088 [ohm] = 0.1841 [W]

4.5745 [A] ^2 * 0.150 [ohm] = 3.1389 [W]

4.5745 [A] ^2 * 0.0285 [ohm] = 0.5964 [W]

4.5745 [A] ^2 * 0.024 [ohm] = 0.5022 [W]

4.5745 [A] ^ 2 * 0.0124 [ohm] = 0.2595 [W]

4.5745 [A] ^ 2 * 0.0156 [ohm] = 0.3265 [W]

Maximum Operating Temperature

175 C

150 C

175 C

175 C

150 C

150 C

Calculated Operating Temperature

(Assume Id = 4.5745 A, T_ambient = 25C)

25 [C] + (0.1841 + 0.09905) [W] * 41[C/W] = 36.61 [C]

25 [C] + (3.1389 + 0.00667) [W] * 44 [C/W] = 163.41 [C]

25 [C] + (0.5964 + 0.041975) [W] * 40 [C/W] = 50.535 [C]

25 [C] + (0.0447525 + 0.5022) * 47 [C/W] = 50.71 [C]

25 [C] + (0.05475 + 0.2595) * 50 [C/W] = 40.71 [C]

25 [C] + (0.06764 + 0.3265) * 55 [C/W] = 46.67 [C]

Comments

Losses are low and it doesn’t get hot but slightly expensive

Not selected, it will burn. Rdson too high

Moderate losses and reasonable operating temperature, reasonable price.

low gate loss and switch losses, cheapest price. Large package. Previously selected.

Low losses and small package. selected

Low losses and small package. Not selected because the package is too small. 0.9mm trace width may not be enough to handle 5A

Decision: we choose Diodes Incorporated DMTH6016LK3-13 as our buck converter’s switching FETs.

Decision: Selected Texas Instrument CSD18534Q5A as the switching FET for low cost, small package and small losses.

 

Bootstrap Circuit

Purpose: generate bias to drive the gate of the High Side FET

 

How it works:

  1. When SW node is GND, internal 5V VCC charges up Cboot through forward biased diode

  2. When SW node is Vin, Cboot still maintains that 5-Vf voltage since the charges on the capacitor has nowhere to go and V = Q/C. The schottky diode blocks current from flowing back to the voltage source.

 

High side switching FET gate capacitance: Cg = Qg / (VCC1 - V_bootDiode)

Cg = 11.1 nC / (5 V - 0.45 V) = 2.440 nF

Cboot > 10 * Cg

0.1 uF >> 0.0244 uF

Conclusion: Using a 0.1 uF capacitor for Cboot will work. DC derating must not lower the capacitance at 5V.

 

Two resistors can be placed in the bootstrap circuit for tuning.

  1. Rboot: Placed in series between Cboot and the diode to limit the charging inrush current to the bootstrap capacitor.

Iboot = Cboot * Vboot / charging time = Cboot * (VCC - Vf) / (1/fsw*(1-DutyCycleMax)) = 0.1 * (5-0.45) / 1/100k*(1-0.362) = 71.32mA

Conclusion: we don’t need a inrush limiting resistor.

  1. Rbst: Placed in series between Cboot and the BST pin to slow down the rise time of the HS FET. Note that a large value on this resistor will trigger the UVLO on the HS gate driver.

This resistor is also helpful to reduce the ringing effect on the SW node by slowing the rise time. It is the most efficient method as the gate resistor and snubber circuit dissipate energy when the HS FET is turning off while Rbst does not do that!!

 

 

Diode selection:

This diode needs to recover fast to block charges on the SW node when HS FET is conducting. And also need to have low Vf to charge Cboot.

Vr > Vin - VCC1 = 50V

Io = Iboot = 71.32mA

selected https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/detail/diodes-incorporated/DFLS160-7/765614

 

Common Mode Choke

Needs Assessment

Do we need this filter?

Motor magnetic field can get coupled to the buck Vin. If there is noise on the buck Vin when the drone is flying in the sky, it is almost impossible to RCA. The common mode filter keeps us away from that situation. So, we should keep the common mode filter if there is space on the PCB

 

How does the common mode choke work?

This noise, known as the common mode noise, will affect both power and ground rails. To maintain the voltage at our buck converter’s input, we use a common mode choke chip to attenuate the common mode noise.

 

When differential currents are coming through, the magnetic field substracts so currents pass through without any impedance. When common mode noise are coming through, the magnetic field adds so the noise current will experience a lot more impedance and most of the noise will be blocked at the choke.

 

Research Notes:

https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/630389/why-does-the-signal-and-power-supply-in-my-custom-esc-breadboard-become-so-noisy

A Survey of Common-Mode Noise

https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/79752/what-is-common-mode-noise

What exactly happens to the signals hitting a common mode choke?

Requirements

  • Current rating > 4.7A

  • Voltage rating > 55V

  • Filter capabilities has little impact because we need fit this big chip on our tiny board

Options

 

Efuse Component Selection

Efuse IC Selection

The table below shows some overcurrent IC options I have found:

 

Choice Summary

Might be overkill, has OV and UV protection features which aren’t required

Jank current-limit resistor equation, needs ratio between nominal output current and current limit

Looks okay?

Name

MAX17813C

 

TPS1H000-Q1

(Other options possible in family)

TCKE800NA

(because Auto-retry)

Input Voltage Range

4.5-60V

3.4-40V

4.4-18V

Current Limit Range

0.15-3A

0.05-1A

0-5A

Available Modes

  • latch-off

  • continuous

  • auto-retry

  • latch-off

  • holding

  • auto-retry

  • latch-off

  • auto-retry

Cost

~$9/chip (Mouser)

~$1/chip (Mouser)

~$2.40/chip (Digikey)